Legal Opinion

McHaney v. Hackleman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 24, 1961No. 13745PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARROW, Justice.

This suit is by A. R. McHaney, as plaintiff, against H. B. Hackleman and W. B. Carter, as defendants, for specific performance of a written contract for the sale and purchase of real estate. The trial was to a jury upon special issues. The plaintiff moved for judgment upon the verdict. The defendants moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, as well as to disregard the jury’s answers to certain issues. The court granted defendants’ motion for judgment non obstante veredicto and denied specific performance, but entered judgment that McHaney recover against the defendants,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wright v. Vernon Compress CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Corzelius v. OliverTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Andrews v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Seamans Oil Co. v. GuyTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Rice v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mercure Co., NV v. Rowland, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
  2. Ginn v. NCI Building Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  3. Carter v. McHaneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  4. Farmers Mutual Protective Ass'n of Texas v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  5. Travelers Insurance Company v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API