Bledsoe v. Ziegenhein Bros. Furniture Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Replevin. Appeal from the City Court of East St. Louis; the Hon. Mortimer Millard, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Duncan
The substance of appellant’s complaint on this appeal is that the court erred in making the order which it did make on said motion, because said minutes were and are erroneous and not sufficient to warrant such amendment. Technically speaking the court is not warranted in ordering issued the writ of retorno habendo until the formal order and judgment of the court is entered that the defendant recover of and from the plaintiff the property taken under the writ of replevin. Section 22 of chapter 119 of Hurd’s Eevised Statutes provides: “If the plaintiff in an action of replevin fails to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Preservers' Co. v. BishopIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- McCrory v. HamiltonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
- American Preservers' Co. v. BishopAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
- Denhard v. DunbarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
- Harris v. SchillingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Contract Purchase Corp. v. McCormickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
- Papista v. Kuhnen & Siegrist Hardware Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1931