Legal Opinion

American Preservers' Co. v. Bishop

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hón. Charles E. Fuller, Judge, presiding.

1Per curiam

This was an action of replevin, brought by the American Preservers’ Company, against Andrew D. Bishop. After the cause was at issue upon pleas and replications, on May 7, 1898, the following judgment was entered in the cause: “On motion of plaintiff’s attorney it is ordered that this suit be and the same is hereby dismissed at plaintiff’s cost. Therefore it is considered by the court that the defendant do have .and recover of and from the plaintiff his costs and charges in this behalf expended and have execution therefor. It is ordered that a retorno habendo do issue herein for the return of…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. National Contract Purchase Corp. v. McCormickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
  2. Bledsoe v. Ziegenhein Bros. Furniture Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1911
  3. American Preservers' Co. v. BishopAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  4. Fitzgerald v. GoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
  5. Papista v. Kuhnen & Siegrist Hardware Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API