Legal Opinion
American Preservers' Co. v. Bishop
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 29, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Replevin.—Trial in the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Charles E. Fuller, Judge, presiding. Verdict and judgment for defendant; appeal by plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams
This was an action of replevin by appellant against appellee. May 5, 1898, the following judgment was entered in the cause:
“ On motion of plaintiff’s attorney it is ordered that this suit be and the same is hereby dismissed at plaintiff’s cost.
Therefore it is considered by the court that the defendant do have and recover of and from the plaintiff his costs and charges in this behalf expended and have execution therefor.
It is ordered that a retorno habendo do issue herein for the return of the property replevied herein by virtue of writ of replevin issued in said cause.
Thereupon the plaintiff…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wiggins v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Coughran v. GutcheusIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
- Minkhart v. HanklerIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
- Ives v. HulceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1885
- McCrory v. HamiltonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bledsoe v. Ziegenhein Bros. Furniture Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1911
- American Preservers' Co. v. BishopAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
- Fitzgerald v. GoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902