Legal Opinion

Suverkrubbe v. Village of Fort Calhoun

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1934No. 29199PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This is an action to recover compensation death benefits under the workmen’s compensation law. Frances Suverkrubbe is plaintiff. Her deceased husband, Albert Suverkrubbe, was the employee. The Village of Fort Calhoun and Nebraska Power Company were employers of Mr.\Suverkrubbe and are defendants.

Plaintiff alleges that, while her husband was employed by defendant village as village marshal and by defendant power company as a watchman and caretaker, in the per*473formance of duties for each of his employers, on the night of December 5, 1932, he was shot by a robber or burglar, whom the employee was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Polk v. GalushaNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Rooney v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Solheim v. Hastings Housing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Schepp v. Mid City Trucking Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Garrotto v. McManusNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Sheets v. Glenwood Telephone Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Pinson v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API