Legal Opinion

Frick v. Frigidaire Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 1932No. Docket No. 4481PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

In this action the plaintiffs filed a complaint seeking an order of the trial court restraining and enjoining the defendant from removing certain frigidaire equipment appliances incorporated as fixtures into a three-story apartment house erected for them under and' by virtue of a contract hereinafter referred to.

The defendant, in addition to answering the plaintiffs’ complaint, filed a cross-complaint in detinue seeking recovery of the property referred to, under a conditional contract of sale entered into with the contractor who erected the apartment house for the plaintiffs. To this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marker v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Allis-Chalmers Co. v. City of AtlanticSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  3. Jermyn v. HunterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  4. Kirkman Nurseries v. SargentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Southern California Hardwood & Manufacturing Co. v. BortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd. v. Unosuke HigashiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. EAC Credit Corp. v. BassCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Etienne v. Millbrae Golf & Country ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Provus Bros. v. SjolanderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API