Legal Opinion

Van Horn v. Kemena

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1924No. Appeal, 113PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

Defendants were general contractors engaged in building an orphanage at Elmhurst. They sublet the plastering contract to plaintiff, who sued to recover the contract price. This dispute arose over the credits defendants were entitled to receive for the plastering materials furnished plaintiff, it being contended the prices charged were reasonable and under the contract. The particular portion of it to be considered reads as follows: “It is understood that so long as we [defendants] can furnish you [plaintiff] the plaster, sand, lime, etc., needed for your work at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Perry v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. Bole v. New Hampshire Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Driebe v. Fort Penn Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Nimlet's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Jessup & Moore Paper Co. v. Bryant Paper Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Windsor Manufacturing Co. v. S. Makransky & SonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Keim Keim v. Lochrie ReeseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API