Legal Opinion
Keystone Retaining Wall System, Inc. v. Westrock, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 16, 1991No. Civ. 91-21-REPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REDDEN, Chief Judge.
A hearing was held on October 2, 1991 on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment and plaintiffs related motions to strike and to dismiss or partially stay defendants’ fourth counterclaim. This opinion will address my rulings on those motions.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Keystone holds certain patents on retaining wall systems and components. It licenses other, independent companies to manufacture and sell its products throughout the country. Keystone itself markets retaining wall systems in only two regions, Minnesota and southern California. Keystone’s retaining…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- KeyStone Retaining Wall Systems, Inc. v. Westrock, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- L.A. Gear, Inc. v. E.S. Originals, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1994
- TRW Financial Systems, Inc. v. Unisys Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
- Keystone Retaining Wall Systems, Inc. v. Westrock, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Aromatique, Inc. v. Gold Seal, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1993