Legal Opinion
Kreindler v. Clarise Sportswear Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 10, 1960PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOCK, District Judge.
This is a motion for an order confirming the award of an arbitrator and directing judgment in favor of petitioner as financial secretary of Blouse and Waistmakers’ Union, Local 25, I.L. G.W.U., hereinafter the Union, against Clarise Sportswear Co., Inc., hereinafter Clarise. Clarise resists the motion on ground that to enforce the award would cause it to violate section 302(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act.
The award directs payment by Clarise of contributions to the Union’s Health and Welfare Fund and Retirement Fund required by the letter of a collective…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Larry Jay, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Larry Jay, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
3Cited by13 opinions
- Walsh v. SchlechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Flynn v. Dick Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Crawford v. CianciulliDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Botany Industries, Inc. v. New York Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Budget Dress Corp. v. Joint Board of Dress & Waistmakers' UnionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.