Redding Medical Center v. Bonta'
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*480Opinion
MASTERSON, J.
Appellant Redding Medical Center requested reimbursement from respondent, the California Department of Health Services (sometimes DHS), for the portion of hospital equipment expenses Redding claimed were attributable to services provided to Medi-Cal patients. DHS auditors later concluded that the instructions followed by Redding in mating its request, which required use of a statistical surrogate to calculate the extent of Medi-Cal usage, were inapplicable because Redding’s books and records permitted the direct assignment of these expenses. On Redding’s challenge to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tiernan v. Trustees of California State University and CollegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- GARFIELD MEDICAL CENTER v. BelsheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Mission Community Hospital v. KizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Intercommunity Medical Center v. BelsheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Memorial Hospital-Ceres v. BelshéCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Southern California Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- CHS-Lake Erie, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of MedicaidOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Redding Medical Center v. Bonta'California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Family Health Centers of San Diego v. State Dept. of Health Care ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021