GARFIELD MEDICAL CENTER v. Belshe
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.
Introduction
This appeal requires interpretation of a federal statute governing payment to hospitals which serve a disproportionate share of Medicaid patients. In particular, the issue is interpreting the phrase “the mean.” California, with approval from the federal government, has interpreted the phrase to permit use of a weighted mean. Appellant, on the other hand, contends that said interpretation violates federal law because Congress intended use of an arithmetic mean. The trial court resolved the issue against appellant. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Amisub (Psl), Inc. v. State of Colorado Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- California Hospital Ass'n v. SchweikerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1982
- United Steelworkers of America v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. MorenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- S.D. Ex Rel. Dickson v. HoodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Olszewski v. Scripps HealthCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- RCJ Medical Services, Inc. v. Bonta´California Court of Appeal · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.