Legal Opinion

Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. Kuther

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 8, 1964No. 109PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

Respondent is the owner of a combination patent covering a fish-canning machíne. A number of machines covered by the patent were manufactured and sold under his authorization. Among them were the four machines in suit, petitioner Wilbur-Ellis Company being the second-hand purchaser. Respondent received out of the original purchase price a royalty of $1,500 per machine. As originally constructed each of these machines packed fish into “1-pound” cans: 3 inches in diameter and 4n/i6 inches high. Three of the machines when acquired by Wilbur-Ellis were corroded, rusted, and inoperative; and all…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United States v. Univis Lens Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Adams v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Wilson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  5. Cotton-Tie Co. v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hensley Equipment Company, Inc. v. Esco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. General Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  3. Hewlett-Packard Company v. Repeat-O-Type Stencil Manufacturing Corporation, Inc. And Fred KeenCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  4. Calhoun v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  5. Allen-Myland, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API