Legal Opinion

Adams v. Houston Lighting & Power Company

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1958No. A-6728PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hickman

In this proceeding the respondent has condemned two parcels of land belonging to the petitioners, one parcel consisting of 2.247 acres as a site for an electric power substation, and the other consisting of 6.982 acres to be burdened with a right of way for transmission lines. It was stipulated that respondent fully complied with all statutory requirements relating to the condemnation of the two easements, and that the only issue of fact to be determined in the trial was the market value of the right of way and easement and the amount of damages accruing to the remainder of petitioners’…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Texas Pipe Line Co. v. HuntTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Whited v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Caylat v. Houston E. & W. T. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  4. Caylat v. Houston East & West Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Burchfield v. TannerTexas Supreme Court · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Flanigan v. CarswellTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Compton v. HenrieTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Stephens County Museum, Inc. v. SwensonTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Texas Consolidated Transportation Co. v. EubanksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. K-Mart No. 4195 v. JudgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API