Legal Opinion

People v. Patel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 24, 2000No. 2-98-1629PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Colwell

The issue presented in this case is whether a passenger in an automobile detained pursuant to a routine traffic stop is entitled to Miranda warnings where the passenger is questioned regarding suspected unlawful activity unrelated to the basis for the stop. The State appeals from the trial court’s order granting the motion to suppress statements of defendant, Samir R Patel. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

Defendant was charged by traffic citation with the unlawful consumption of alcohol by a minor. 235 ILCS 5/6 — 20 (West 1996). Defendant filed a motion to suppress the statements he…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. People v. NielsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. BraggsIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Village of Algonquin v. TildenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. People v. Braggs Modified on Denial of Rehearing - replaces opinion filed 12/18/03Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Village of Algonquin v. TildenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API