Legal Opinion

Calderon v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 30, 1996No. 96-70585PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether a California death row inmate’s procedural default in state court bars federal review of his habeas claims.

I

Arthur Calderon, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin (the “State”), petitions this court for a writ of mandamus directing the district court to vacate its order *1128denying the State’s motion for summary dismissal of Anthony Bean’s habeas petition.

In June 1981, a jury convicted Bean of the murders of Beth Schatz and Eileen Fox. Bean was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole for the murder of Fox, and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Ylst v. NunnemakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Johnson v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Ford v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bean v. CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7278, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,963 Arthur Calderon, Warden v. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Anthony Cornell Bean, Real-Party-In-InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9269, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15,299 Arthur Calderon, Warden, and James Gomez, Director of the California Department of Corrections v. U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California (Sacramento), Blufford Hayes, Jr., Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9096, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,770 Anthony Cornell Bean, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Calderon v. U.S. District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API