Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Stots

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 1974No. Appeal, 1279PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cercone, J.,

This appeal arises from a conviction of the appellant by the trial court sitting without a jury, of “willfully and wantonly pointing [or discharging] a firearm.” Act of June 21, 1939, P. L. 872, §716, 18 P.S. §1716. The appellant argues that the trial court erred in finding him guilty under the indictment since it charged him with “attempt with intent to kill,” and not with “willfully and wantonly pointing [or discharging] a pistol.” Thus the appellant argues that the crime for which he was convicted is not a “lesser included offense.” Specifically, the appellant argues,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Clyatt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Moszczynski v. AsheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Commonwealth v. ComberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. GouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. PemberthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. FarmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. CatheySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API