Legal Opinion
G-I Holdings, Inc. v. Baron & Budd
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 9, 2001No. 01 Civ. 0216(RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff G-Holdings Inc. (“G-I Holdings”) has moved for a preliminary injunction barring defendants Baron & Budd, P.C. (“Baron & Budd”) and Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole (“Ness, Motley”) from seeking relief in other courts with respect to factual investigation and discovery in this action, pursuant to the All-Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65, and defendants Baron & Budd, Frederick Baron, Russell Budd, Ness, Motley, Ronald Motley, Joseph Rice, Weitz & Luxenberg, Perry Weitz, and Robert Gordon (collectively, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- von Bulow v. von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Fun-Damental Too, Ltd. v. Gemmy Industries Corp. Kay-Bee Toy & Hobby Shops, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Doe v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- Blum v. SchlegelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Polycast Technology Corp. v. Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. Kalamazoo OphthalmologyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2004
- Fecteau v. The City of Mount VernonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Mosaic Health, Inc. and Central Virginia Health Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly USA, LLC, Novo Nordisk Inc., and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LPDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2026