Legal Opinion

In Re Adoption/Guardianship Nos. 11387 & 11388

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 29, 1999No. 56, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

■ The issue we must decide in this case is whether a natural parent whose parental rights were terminated as a result of her failure to respond to a petition for guardianship is entitled to present evidence in a status hearing conducted pursuant to Maryland Code § 5-319 of the Family Law Article. We shall hold that a natural parent, who has not waived the right to notice of the status of his or her child(ren) provided by § 5-319(b) and who attends a hearing under § 5-319(f) to review that status, has a statutory right to participate in the hearing, and thus is entitled to present…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Marriott Employees Federal Credit Union v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Frost v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Armstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Billy W.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Davis v. Attorney GeneralCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. T97036005Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. In re: Adoption/G'ship of L.B. and I.L.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  5. In Re Adoption/Guardianship Nos. 11387 & 11388Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API