Legal Opinion
Highton v. Musto
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 23, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
186 N.J. Super. 281 (1982)
452 A.2d 487
THOMAS HIGHTON AND ROBERT MENDENDEZ, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
WILLIAM MUSTO, JOSEPH BRADY, SUPERINTENDENT OF ELECTIONS OF THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, AND LINDA CALABRESE, DE FACTO ACTING CLERK OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Hudson County.
Decided June 23, 1982.
Eric J. Bal for plaintiffs.
Thomas A. DeClemente for defendant William V. Musto (DeClemente & Klitzner, attorneys).
Kenneth M. Olex for plaintiff State of New Jersey (Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).
George J. Kaplan for defendant Linda…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. MustoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Sheridan v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
- Alongi v. SchatzmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Haack v. RanieriNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- In Re Keogh-DwyerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Atlantic City Mun. Utilities Authority v. HuntNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Evans v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Patterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985