Legal Opinion

Ellis v. Randle

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 1, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Dallas. Tried below before Hon. W. J. J. Smith.

1Opinion of the Court

TEMPLET OH, Associate Justice.

In March, 1897, 0. H. Alexander, who is one of the appellees, bought from the estate of L. A. Ellis a lot of sugar-house machinery situated in Louisiana. It seems that one I. Gr. Randle was interested in the purchase, and that he and Alexander owned the property in equal shares, but it was held in Alexander’s name. On April 22, 1897, Alexander conveyed the machinery to the appellant, C. Gr. Ellis, by a bill of sale which recited a consideration of $25,000, paid and to be paid. Randle agreed to the sale. He was to receive $12,500 for his interest in the property.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. . RentzNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Hale v. ParmleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1850
  3. Kenny v. Clarkson & Van HorneNew York Supreme Court · 1806
  4. Saunders v. DuvalTexas Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. ReitzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Southwest Gas Co. v. DoneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Mitchell v. ReitzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Odom's Unknown Heirs v. CrewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API