Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Reitz

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 18, 1924No. 1688. [fn*]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The statement of the nature and result of the suit in plaintiffs in error's brief is substantially correct, and we adopt it, save and except such restatement as we may make as to the state of the proof, which will be made so far as deemed necessary in discussing the several propositions of plaintiffs in error, and defendant in error's cross-assignments of error.

March 17, 1924, M. J. Reitz filed first amended original petition in the Pecos county district court, complaining of Edwin Mitchell, J. W. Grant, F. S. Wilson, D. E. Lindsey, and John O. Weden, and sought to recover certain lands,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Howard v. NorthTexas Supreme Court · 1849
  2. Northcraft v. OliverTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. People v. VelardeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. French v. GrenetTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Chapman v. . the City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1869

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jeter v. JeterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Harrison v. WhiteleyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  3. Keda Development Corp. v. Stanglin, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  4. Mitchell v. ReitzTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API