Legal Opinion

Stone v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 2011No. S-13524PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINFREE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

We granted this petition to consider the narrow question of whether under the Federal Constitution a eriminal defendant's court-appointed counsel must, upon the defendant's demand after lawful sentencing pursuant to a plea agreement, file a petition for discretionary sentence review by this court when AS 12.55.120(a) precludes an appeal of right to the court of appeals. We now answer "yes" to that question.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

David Stone was charged with manslaughter, two counts of assault, and driving under the influence. Because Stone was already…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State, Department of Natural Resources v. Nondalton Tribal CouncilAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Marlon Mack v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2023
  3. Kyte v. StallingsAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Alexie N. Walters Jr. v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2023
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API