Legal Opinion
State, Department of Natural Resources v. Nondalton Tribal Council
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided January 20, 2012No. S-13681PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STOWERS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Six tribal councils, joined by two other associations (collectively "the Tribes"), filed an action against the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources (DNR) in the superior court in Dillingham seeking declaratory judgment that the 2005 Bristol Bay Area Plan (BBAP, the Plan) was unlawful. DNR's motion to dismiss under Civil Rule 12(b)(6) was denied and the superior court held that: (1) the BBAP is a regulation that must be promulgated under the Alaska Administrative Procedure Act (APA), and (2) Alaska Appellate Rule 602(a)(2)-which provides for a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Richard A. Batterton, Secretary of Employment & Social Services of the State of Maryland v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal GovernmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Gilbert v. State, Department of Fish & Game, Board of FisheriesAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Summer Sagoonick v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, Inc. v. State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources and Alaska Mental Health Trust AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
- AVCG, LLC v. State of Alaska, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
- Denali Citizens Council v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.