Flynn v. Fahlgren & Swink, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendant Fahlgren & Swink, Inc.’s (“F & S”) motion to dismiss Count IV of Plaintiffs Complaint. The plaintiff, Nancy L. Flynn (“Flynn”) filed a memorandum in opposition to the motion, to which the defendant has filed a reply memorandum. The dismissal is sought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Essentially, the motion surrounds the issue of whether the State of Ohio recognizes the tort of negligent infliction of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Paugh v. HanksOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Schultz v. Barberton Glass Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Dr. Finn F. L'Orange v. The Medical Protective CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Pasternak v. Sagittarius Recording CoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gausmann v. City of AshlandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
- Crihfield v. Monsanto Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1994