Legal Opinion

Flynn v. Fahlgren & Swink, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 23, 1990No. C2-90-200PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendant Fahlgren & Swink, Inc.’s (“F & S”) motion to dismiss Count IV of Plaintiffs Complaint. The plaintiff, Nancy L. Flynn (“Flynn”) filed a memorandum in opposition to the motion, to which the defendant has filed a reply memorandum. The dismissal is sought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Essentially, the motion surrounds the issue of whether the State of Ohio recognizes the tort of negligent infliction of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Paugh v. HanksOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Schultz v. Barberton Glass Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Dr. Finn F. L'Orange v. The Medical Protective CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  5. Pasternak v. Sagittarius Recording CoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gausmann v. City of AshlandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
  2. Crihfield v. Monsanto Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API