Legal Opinion

Fried v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 9, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEINBERG, District Judge.

This is an action by ten alleged stockholders of The Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company (“Lackawanna”) to enjoin in part or void entirely an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission (“Commission”) authorizing the merger of the Lackawanna and the Erie Railroad Company (“Erie”). The action is brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1336, 1398 and 2321-25. The merged railroad has intervened as a party defendant.

The merger under attack was accomplished pursuant to the Commission’s order on October 17, 1960. Two days later, plaintiffs filed a complaint in this…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Opp Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Administrator of the Wage & Hour Division of the Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Northern Plains Resource Council v. Board of Natural Resources & ConservationMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Bruno v. Western Pacific RailroadCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1985
  3. Clearfield Cheese Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1969
  4. Northern Plains Resource Council v. Board of Natural Resources & ConservationMontana Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API