Legal Opinion

BE&K INC. v. Baker

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 5, 2003No. 1020594PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEK, Inc., BEK Properties, Inc., Polar Real Estate Corporation, and Polar Property Development, Inc. (hereinafter referred to collectively as "the counterclaim defendants"), appeal, pursuant to Ala.R.App.P. 5, from the trial court's interlocutory order denying their motions for judgment on the pleadings. We granted permission to appeal, and we now dismiss the appeal without prejudice.

I

Polar-BEK Company ("Polar-BEK") is a joint venture consisting of two corporations — BEK Properties, Inc., and Polar Property Development, Inc. Polar-BEK owns Iberia Corporation ("Iberia"). Polar-BEK and Iberia…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Exxon Corp. v. DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RES.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. ROMAR DEV. v. Gulf View Management Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. v. LucasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Birmingham News Co. v. HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Gowens v. Tys. S. Ex Rel. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Brown ex rel. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  4. Precision Gear Co. v. Continental Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  5. Public Building Authority v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API