Legal Opinion

Smith v. Foster

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

— In this action, the appellees, as plaintiffs, sued the appellants, as defendants, before a justice of the peace of Hamilton county, Indiana, upon a promissory note, of which the following is a copy :

“ $92.50. April the 22d, 1875.
“ Eight months after date, we promise to pay to Harry Peeky, or order, the sum of ninety-two dollars and fifty cents, for value received, without any relief whatever *596from valuation or appraisement laws. Interest after maturity. (Signed,) Hiram Smith,
“F. M. Lane.”

Before the justice, the appellants filed an answer, duly verified, denying the execution of the note. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sloan v. WittbankIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Shaw v. BinkardIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Carver v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Key v. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Coffin v. Evansville & Crawfordsville RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gunel v. CueIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Young v. DickeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. McArthur v. LefflerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Doherty v. ChaseIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API