Legal Opinion

Williams v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 9, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This was an action by certain bondholders secured by a deed in trust upon the defendant's property, alleging insolvency, asking a decree of foreclosure, and a receiver pendente lite. The action was begun in 1894, a receiver appointed soon thereafter, and a decree of foreclosure at March Term, 1895, sale thereunder 6 July, for the sum of $10,000, and report confirmed at August Term, 1895. At the same term, the Falls of Neuse Manufacturing Company was allowed to intervene, and the plaintiff bondholders excepted, which exception is one of the matters which now come up for review.

The ground of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Belvin v. Raleigh Paper Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. Hancock Bros. & Co. v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Pocahontas Coal Co. v. Henderson Electric Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Wilmington & Weldon Railroad v. BurnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  5. Clement v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clement v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  2. Helsabeck v. . VassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Helsabeck v. VassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Clement v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API