Legal Opinion · Dissent

Clement v. . King

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1DissentClark, C. J.

Action, heard on motion for judgment upon the pleadings. His Honor denied the motion, and plaintiff appealed. The facts alleged and admitted in the pleadings and exhibits are substantially as follows: The High Point Trunk and Bag Company, which we will hereafter designate as the "Trunk Company," was a manufacturing corporation, created under the laws of this State, and doing business at High Point, where it owned a factory site and buildings thereon, together with machinery and other property.

For the purposes of its business the Trunk Company decided to borrow $5,000, but its credit being…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lockwood v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Belvin v. Raleigh Paper Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Pocahontas Coal Co. v. Henderson Electric Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Frazee v. NelsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Helsabeck v. . VassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Helsabeck v. VassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Dial v. ChatmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API