Legal Opinion

Arrow Transportation Co. v. Hill

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1963PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

Plaintiffs brought this proceeding to set aside two orders of the Public Utilities Commissioner granting amended motor carrier permits to Portland Motor Transport, Inc. and Widing Transportation, Inc., who became intervenors in the proceeding. This is an appeal from the judgment of the Marion county circuit court sustaining the Commissioner’s orders, on the ground that he had acted within the scope of his authority and upon substantial evidence.

In March, 1962 intervenors (hereafter referred to as applicants) filed applications with the Commissioner pursuant to the provisions of OES chapter…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Forde L. Johnson Oil Co. v. H. F. Johnson Oil Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Sinett v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1955
  3. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc. v. FlaggOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Kerrville Bus Co. v. Continental Bus SystemCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. Smith & Solomon Trucking Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morey v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. Mt. Hood Stages, Inc. v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Borich Transfer Co. v. HaleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API