Legal Opinion

Sinett v. United States

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided November 17, 1955No. Civ. A. 840-54PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Arthur Sinett, doing business as Supreme Trucking Company (hereinafter referred to as applicant), seeks to set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission which denied, in part, an application for additional operating rights.

Applicant owns four tractors and four flat bed trailers. Applicant serves one shipper, the Valentine Brick Company, (hereinafter referred to as shipper) presently a division of A. P. Green Fire Brick Company. The flat bed trailers have been tailored especially to handle the firebrick and fireclay of shipper, which constitutes the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Federal Radio Comm'n v. Nelson Brothers Bond & Mortgage Co. (Station WIBO)Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. McLean Trucking Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Florida v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. United States v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. W. J. Dillner Transfer Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Armored Carrier Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1966
  3. Colorado-Arizona-California Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1963
  4. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1965
  5. Robbins v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API