Legal Opinion

Newton v. Wimsatt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1990No. 16503PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARRISH, Judge.

Cleda and Paul R. Newton (hereafter referred to as “appellants”) by their first amended petition brought an action to quiet title to certain real estate (Count I) and for unlawful detainer (Count II). That action *825was brought against Robert B. Wimsatt (hereafter referred to as “respondent”). Respondent filed a counterclaim seeking, in equity, an order for the real estate to be conveyed to him, or, alternatively, a money judgment “for the reasonable value of the services provided, materials furnished, and funds expended by Defendant for Jeanette Thummel [sic].” Following trial…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Edgar v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. Teson v. VasquezMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Trautz v. LempSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  5. Potter v. WinterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1997
  2. Whites v. WhitesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Estate of Hatten v. Mercantile Bank of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Hoefer v. MusserMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Hamilton Hauling, Inc. v. SleysterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API