Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

TCG Detroit v. City of Dearborn

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 2004No. Docket 232609Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWilder, J.

I concur and join with the majority in finding that the Michigan Telecommunications Act (MTA), MCL 484.2101 et seq., specifically § 253, MCL 484.2253, does not violate the Michigan Constitution, Const 1963, art 7, § 29. I disagree, however, with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court properly interpreted and applied § 253 to require a substantial nexus between the fee defendant charged plaintiff and the costs incurred *108by defendant to maintain its rights-of-way, easements, or public places attributable to use by plaintiff. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent from sections III, IV, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. Marlette Homes, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Wickens v. Oakwood Healthcare SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Lewis v. LeGrowMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Eggleston v. Bio-Medical Applications of Detroit, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Danse Corp. v. City of Madison HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API