Legal Opinion
The President Coolidge
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 23, 1939No. 8846PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
101 F.2d 638 (1939)
THE PRESIDENT COOLIDGE.
DOLLAR S. S. CO.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 8846.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
January 23, 1939.
Thompson, Wood & Russell, of Honolulu, T. H., and Keith R. Ferguson, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Ingram M. Stainback, U. S. Atty., and J. Frank McLaughlin, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Honolulu, T. H., and Frank J. Hennessy, U. S. Atty., and Robert B. McWilliams, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and HANEY, Circuit Judges.
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
The Act of March 3, 1899, 30 Stat. 1152, § 13, 33…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The ColomboCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Hegglund v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- The J. Rich SteersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- United States v. The BombayDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1891
- United States v. The Anjer HeadDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Pennsylvania Industrial Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. White Fuel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Shipman v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1970
- The Pan-AmCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- United States v. HelenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.