Legal Opinion

United States v. Helen

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 20, 1947No. 32, Docket 20677PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to 33 U.S.C.A. § 450, the United States filed a libel in rem against the scow Helen to recover a penalty of not less than $250.incurred by discharging a quantity of lumber into the tidal waters of New York Harbor in violation of 33 U.S.C.A. § 441. The scow’s owner, Christie Scow Corporation, denied the allegations of the libel and filed a petition impleading the Pennsylvania Railroad Company as charterer of the scow; the charterer in turn impleaded T. Hogan & Sons, a stevedoring corporation, which was unloading the scow when the alleged violation of the statute…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. The BarnstableSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Soderberg v. Atlantic Lighterage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  3. Eastern Massachusetts Street Ry. Co. v. Transmarine Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
  4. Tebo v. Mayor of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1894
  5. The S. S. Nea HellisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. the Tug Terry E. BuchananDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  2. Offshore Tel. Co. v. M/V WATERBUCK, M/V STATE POINTDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1979
  3. United States v. The M/V Martin & Barge MOS-101Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
  4. United States v. The M/V MartinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API