Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of Baltimore

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 12, 1913PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of the city of Norfolk in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for the Plaintiff assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

This is an action of assumpsit brought by the plaintiff in error, Max Rosenberg, hereinafter called the plaintiff, against the defendant in error, The United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, hereinafter termed the defendant.

The object of the action is to recover damages for the *222alleged breach of a contract of guaranty whereby the defendant undertook and promised to make good and reimburse the plaintiff (to the extent of $1,000) for all pecuniary loss sustained by him for moneys, etc., in the possession of one B. S. Johnson, as manager for the plaintiff, for which he was responsible, by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. New River Mineral Co. v. PainterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
  2. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co. v. Consolidated Turnpike Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1910
  3. Lane Bros. & Co. v. BausermanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  4. Frank v. ZeiglerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Deatrick's Administrator v. State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fisher v. Globe Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  2. Sun Co. v. BurrussSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  3. Lake Bowling Alley, Inc. v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
  4. Cross v. WhitehurstLoudoun County Circuit Court · 1992
  5. Alleghany Highlands County School Board v. CommonwealthRichmond County Circuit Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API