Legal Opinion

Frank v. Zeigler

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1899PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Cabell County. Actions by Frank & Adler and others against J. Zeigler, and by Bohm Bros. & Co. against the same and other defendants. The causes were consolidated. From the decree, Burgunder Bros. & Co. and others appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Brannon, Judge:

Jacob Zeigler for years prior to 1896 carried on, the business of a merchant, selling chiefly ready-made clothing; having one store at Huntington and one at Charleston, the average stock in each being about the value of ten thousand -dollars. He owned a storehouse in Huntington, valued at five thousand dollars, which was under a lien for about that amount. In May, 1896, he was very deeply indebted, —far beyond his assets. He owed the lien on the storehouse. He owed the First National Bank of Huntington and the Kanawha Valley Bank and Citizens’ National Bank of Charleston a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Burt v. TimmonsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Goshorn's Ex'r v. SnodgrassWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Thomas Deye Owings and Others v. Andrew KincannonSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  4. Layne v. Ohio River R'dWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. United States Blowpipe Co. v. SpencerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Sidney C. Smith Corp. v. DaileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Tennant's Heirs v. FrettsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Smith v. SmithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. White v. WhiteWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. Concrete Steel Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API