Legal Opinion

Shorb v. Bishop (In Re Shorb)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 11, 1989No. Bankruptcy No. 87-06585, BAP No. WW 88-1103-JAsRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*186OPINION

ASHLAND, Bankruptcy Judge:

The debtor Douglas Shorb appeals the bankruptcy court’s order approving and determining the method of payment of his attorney’s fees.

FACTS

Subsequent to filing a Chapter 13 petition, the debtor filed a three year plan. The plan contained provisions calling for payment of the debtor’s attorney’s fees in accordance with § 1326 of the Bankruptcy Code, and required payment to priority creditors in advance of general unsecured creditors.

Celeste Bishop, the debtor’s ex-spouse, objected to the confirmation of the plan. She holds a judgment against the debtor. At the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sierra Switchboard Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. In Re ParkerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1981
  3. Matter of ParkerDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1982
  4. In Re TenneyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1986
  5. In Re ColstonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1981

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re CasonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995
  2. In Re HarrisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  3. In Re PedersenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1999
  4. In Re CookUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 1997
  5. In Re Pappas & Rose, P.C.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API