In Re Tenney
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BOHANON, Bankruptcy Judge.
Debtors have proposed a plan pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1321. Tinker Credit Union, a partially secured creditor, objects to confirmation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1324. The plan provides for full payment of administrative claims in advance of all other claims. 11 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1). Tinker objects to this provision because holders of secured claims would receive no disbursements until the third or fourth month of the plan.
We are asked to determine the proper order of disbursement of funds received by the Chapter 13 trustee. Policy considerations are apparent. First…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re ParkerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1981
- Matter of ParkerDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1982
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re JockUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1989
- In Re CasonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995
- In Re HarrisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- In Re PedersenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1999
- In Re CookUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.