Legal Opinion
White Hawk Group, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 25, 2010No. 09-374CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASKIR, Judge.
This transfer ease arises out of a procurement undertaken by the U.S. Department of the Army (Army), to enter into an indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity (ID/IQ) contract for various maintenance and repair services at Fort Sill, Oklahoma. For the reasons stated below, we dismiss the plaintiffs’ Complaint for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief and find in favor of the government.
BACKGROUND
The following summary provides background information on the procurement and various administrative and judicial challenges pursued to date by the plaintiff and interve-nors.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Information Technology & Applications Corporation v. United States, and Rs Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- PlanetSpace Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Harmonia Holdings Group, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- 22nd Century Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
- Safeguard Base Operations, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019