Legal Opinion

United States v. Jackson

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided March 9, 1983No. NMCM 82 4431PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue before this court is whether the military judge erred when he denied a motion to dismiss the charge and its single specification as having been barred from prosecution by a previous trial due to the running of the statute of limitations, thereby invoking the doctrine of res judicata. Appellant had been arraigned and pleaded guilty on 20 May 1982 to an offense of unauthorized absence alleged to have commenced on 22 February 1980, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice (U.C.M.J.), 10 U.S.C. § 886. Before proceeding through the providence inquiry, however, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. OppenheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. United States v. RodgersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. United States v. ArsneaultUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  5. United States v. FrenchUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. BlairU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1986
  2. United States v. JacksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API