People v. Scherbner
Justice Court of Village of Muttontown
1Opinion of the Court
*252OPINION OF THE COURT
Martin I. Kaminsky, J.
This case raises a new issue as to when the defendant in a traffic case must request a supporting deposition in order not to waive his/her right to such a supporting deposition.
The 1996 amendment to CPL 100.25 requires a defendant to request a supporting deposition within 30 days of the return date of his/her ticket, regardless of whether the defendant has yet been arraigned. For the reasons explained below, the court holds that CPL 100.25 should be applied in a manner consistent with prior Court of Appeals determinations on when a court acquires…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Claim of Thomas v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. AucelloAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1990
- People v. RossiJustice Court of Village of Muttontown · 1992
- Claim of Thomas v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. GuttersonLattingtown Village Court · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. ZappulaJustice Court of Village of Muttontown · 2013
- People v. KehoeNew York Justice Court · 2011