Legal Opinion

People v. Zappula

Justice Court of Village of Muttontown

Decided July 17, 2013PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*227OPINION OF THE COURT

Martin I. Kaminsky, J.

This case asks what mode of communication must be used to make an effective request for a supporting deposition pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 100.25 (2). The People contend that a request which was faxed to the court was insufficient to start the 30-day time period within which a deposition must be provided and that an effective request was made only later when the court received a mailed copy of the request. For the reasons stated below, the court disagrees.

Defendant Luke Zappula is charged with speeding in violation of section 1180 (b) of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Shelby County v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. People v. NuccioNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. People v. AucelloAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1990
  5. People v. RossiJustice Court of Village of Muttontown · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. ZappulaJustice Court of Village of Muttontown · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API