Rural Water District No. 3, Pushmataha County v. Antlers Public Works Authority
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JONES, Presiding Judge:
Appellant, Antlers Public Works Authority [“Authority”], seeks reversal of judgment rendered by the trial court following a nonju-ry trial. The trial court reduced Authority’s requested increase in rates for water which Authority supplies to Appellee, Rural Water District No. 3 of Pushmataha County [“District”]. Authority contends a provision of its contract with District was constitutionally or statutorily infirm, and the trial court’s judgment resulted in a constitutionally proscribed taking without just compensation. We disagree, and so affirm the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sublett v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Burkhardt v. City of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Lawrence v. SchellstedeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Pettit v. American National Bank of AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Grant, Schon, Wise & Grant, P.C. v. R. W. Borrowdale Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Oklahoma City v. HamiltonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
- Questions Submitted by: The Honorable Glen Mulready and the Honorable Jason Blair, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2025
- GEO Group Inc v. Hinton Economic Development AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2025
- Opinion No. (1998), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1998
- Opinion No. (2004), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2004