Legal Opinion

Rural Water District No. 3, Pushmataha County v. Antlers Public Works Authority

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 23, 1993No. 79557PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JONES, Presiding Judge:

Appellant, Antlers Public Works Authority [“Authority”], seeks reversal of judgment rendered by the trial court following a nonju-ry trial. The trial court reduced Authority’s requested increase in rates for water which Authority supplies to Appellee, Rural Water District No. 3 of Pushmataha County [“District”]. Authority contends a provision of its contract with District was constitutionally or statutorily infirm, and the trial court’s judgment resulted in a constitutionally proscribed taking without just compensation. We disagree, and so affirm the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sublett v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Burkhardt v. City of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Lawrence v. SchellstedeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Pettit v. American National Bank of AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Grant, Schon, Wise & Grant, P.C. v. R. W. Borrowdale Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Oklahoma City v. HamiltonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Questions Submitted by: The Honorable Glen Mulready and the Honorable Jason Blair, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2025
  3. GEO Group Inc v. Hinton Economic Development AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2025
  4. Opinion No. (1998), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1998
  5. Opinion No. (2004), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API