Legal Opinion

State v. Kingsley

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1986No. Cr. 1110-1111PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Justice.

Donald Kingsley has filed appeals from two judgments of conviction for gross sexual imposition entered by the District Court of Burleigh County. The two appeals, each involving a single identical legal issue, were consolidated for purpose of argument and decision by this Court. We affirm both judgments of conviction.

Kingsley was charged with two counts of gross sexual imposition under Section 12.1-20-03(l)(e), N.D.C.C.:

“12.1-20-03. Gross sexual imposition.
“1. A person who engages in a sexual act with another, or who causes another to engage in a sexual act, is guilty of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. AllenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. EngebretsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. WilsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. SteinbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  3. State v. HafnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. MirandaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. State v. SchaefferNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API