State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Fitts
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court, Maupin, J.:
In response to a certified question submitted by the Nevada Federal District Court,1 we consider whether Nevada automobile insurers may contractually alter the statutory time frame within which an insured may file a claim for uninsured or underinsured motorist benefits. Although we do not entirely foreclose the possibility, we hold that the alteration provision before us is unenforceable and therefore void as against Nevada public policy.
INTRODUCTION
Automobile liability insurance policies issued for delivery in Nevada must, subject to narrowly defined…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bergmann v. BoyceNevada Supreme Court · 1993
- Siggelkow v. Phoenix InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1993
- Green v. Selective Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Wille v. Geico Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Grayson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McDonnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Allstate Insurance v. FackettNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- American States Insurance Company v. Joann LaFlamSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
- Picardi v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Good Fellas Market v. AmGuard Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.