Legal Opinion

Haedike v. Kodiak Research, Ltd.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 22, 1993No. 92 C 4812PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Plaintiff Edward William Haedike brings this product liability action against Kodiak Research, Ltd. (“Kodiak”), Bombardier-Ro-tax, GmbH (“Rotax”) and Fritz Hintermayer, GmbH, Bing-Vergaser-Fabrik (incorrectly sued as Bing Vergasser) (“Bing”) for injuries he suffered in the crash of a Wizard ultralight aircraft, Model No. J-3BK440 in Metta-wa, Illinois on June 8, 1991. Kodiak, Rotax and Bing each have filed motions to dismiss Haedike’s complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2).…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kohler Co. v. Kohler International, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
  2. Leslie v. St. Vincent New Hope, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995
  3. Boston Chicken, Inc. v. Market Bar-B-Que, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  4. S.M.W. Seiko, Inc. v. Howard Concrete Pumping Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2001
  5. Reich v. McManusDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API