Breault v. Archambault
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by certain defendants, except Lane & Raymo, in each. case from orders of the district court for St. Louis county, Ensign, J., overruling a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
COLLINS, J.2
These actions, brought to enforce log liens under the provisions of G-. S. 1894, §§ 2451-2465, inclusive, against the same defendants, were argued and submitted together.
The complaint in the case in which Breault was plaintiff set forth three causes of action, — the first being on account of services rendered by plaintiff himself, as a cook in the logging camp; the second, for services rendered at the same time and place by another person, as assistant cook or “cookie,” assigned to plaintiff; and the third, for services rendered by still another person, as a blacksmith, at the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Winslow v. UrquhartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Hogan v. CushingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Martin v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- King v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Perry v. Duluth Transfer Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
3Cited by14 opinions
- Miller & Lux Inc. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Brazier Forest Products, Inc. v. Northern Transport, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Fay v. Bankers Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Hess & Skinner Engineering Co. v. TurneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Phillips v. AtwellSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.