Legal Opinion

Meyerland Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1993No. D-2893PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This cause was removed from a state court of appeals to federal district court on appeal by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). In re Meyerland, 960 F.2d 512 (5th Cir.1992) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 967, 122 L.Ed.2d 123 (1993). Subsequently, the state court of appeals granted the FDIC’s motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 848 S.W.2d 165.

The court of appeals’ order of dismissal was void because it occurred after the cause had been removed to federal court. Once removal is effected, “the State court shall proceed no further unless and…

2Cited by36 opinions

  1. Stroud v. VBFSB Holding Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  2. in Re University of the Incarnate Word, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
  3. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Appellant, v. DEL MAR PROPERTIES, L.P., Appellee, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2014
  4. Victoria Palms Resort Inc. v. City of DonnaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. Adriene Sibley v. Seminole Pipeline Company, LLC, Enterprise Products Operating, LLC, First Call Field Services Corp., and TDW Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2017

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API