Legal Opinion

Pratt v. Connor

California Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1900No. S.F. No. 1296PublishedCited by 21 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFaRLAND, J.

This is an appeal by Delos Pratt from an order of the superior court denying his motion to modify, and also to vacate a certain award of arbitrators.

The appellant Pratt and the respondent Connor,by an instrument in writing in due form and properly executed, submitted to three named arbitrators certain controversies pending between ■them -concerning the amount due on a certain promissory note tnade by Connor to Pratt, and -also concerning moneys claimed to he due from Pratt to Connor, arising out of transactions about certain lots of land—Hos. 14 and 15—in Eden Park tract, Alameda county. It…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tyson v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
  2. Russell v. SeerySupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Sapp v. BarenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Crofoot v. Blair Holdings Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp. v. C.S.T., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Utah Construction Co. v. Western Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1916

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API